I am going to advertise www.jillstanek.com and encourage you all to subscribe to her feeds. She is well documented and is the very nurse that testified before Obama when this issue of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act began in Obama's political home state of Illinois. Many links to her site are below as I did a 7 part series of Jill Stanek vs Obama. You will see how well she documents her site as you investigate further into this issue and utilize her site for other similar issues. It's always good to get Obama's side and her side and other sources as well but definitely try to understand Obama's side and her's and then check out others and make your decision on this issue but do not leave out her's. She reveals alot more then you would ever know listening to the liberal media sources...See below...Wow!!!

Here is a sample of recent posts on her blog:

McCain goes after Obama for Born Alive opposition in today's radio address-08/23/2008

Stanek to attend Democrat Convention-08/23/2008 "SO! I will be live blogging from the DNC next week! If all goes well, I'll not only provide commentary and news but also video and photos. I have even registered to attend the pro-abortion group EMILY's List now-sold-out gala with guest speakers Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama. Now that should be interesting. I plan also to cover pro-life events and pickets. So when next I write it will be from the Mile High City!"

Did IL abortion law protect babies aborted alive?-08/22/2008. Two video reports and well documented!!!

RH Reality Unchecked-08/22/2008"In reality, Amanda is now being endlessly tortured by the "bloody remains of later term abortions." That photo is so sad. Makes me all the more determined. I want to pause and extend heartfelt thanks to many of you and many blog friends for mopping up after me in the comments section here, on Left blogs, and your own blogs. This allows me to remain focused on exposing Obama as pro-abortion on steroids to the point he supports letting little preemie babies die cold and alone in hospital soiled utility rooms because saving them would "burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion," as we have now have him saying on audiotape."-Warning: picture of baby that should never be.

Stanek on the O'Reilly Factor-09/04/2007. "On September 29, 2000, I was interviewed on the O'Reilly Factor about my experience as an RN at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, IL, holding a live aborted baby. Bill O'Reilly was uncharacteristically speechless a couple times throughout, which may be why he chose to replay this as one of his five highlights of the year on December 28, 2000."

Now to Jill Stanek vs Obama in 7 parts

Part 1

New Documents Revealing Obama's cover up on Born Alive Infant Protection-"Jill Stanek was the nurse that testified before congress and Obama on behalf of the babies born alive. In Illinois the act didn't pass until after Obama left his position in 2005. She claims Obama was instrumental in blocking this bill from passing in Illinois. Review the evidence for yourself below, with this well documented post by Jill and more. Is it Providence that the Born Alive Infant Protection Act has it's roots in the state of Obama's political career? Is God saying something to us as a nation concerning the unborn or is this all coincidence?"

Part 2

Jill Stanek vs Obama. Jill documents her credibility in response to Obama's smears.-"Praise the Lord!!! May this issue continue to get the intention it deserves and may Jill continue to be that stumbling block for Obama's campaign for the sake of the lives of the unborn and the salvation and/or maturity in the personal life of Obama. I am believing and praying for CHANGE in the life of Obama and the democrat party. More on the providence of God over this issue tomorrow in Jill Stanek vs Obama part 3..."

Part 3

Jill Stanek vs Obama. Obama a Providential God send?-"Jill Stanek (Nurse who testified before Obama concerning babies being left to die in a utility room after surviving an abortion see above links for further information) reports on 08/11/2008 two new documents produced by the National Right to Life proving that Obama has been misrepresenting his position on the issue concerning the Born Alive Infant Protection Act in his state. Five days later on 08/16/2008 Obama is asked by a christian news broadcasting company (who else would be the first to ask such a question) about his position on the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, during his very first and historic meeting at a christian church with McCain (again see above links for further context and evidence).....Now, back to Providence or Coincidence? (See more concerns on the media below). This may be a damaging issue to Obama's campaign we will have to wait and see but one thing for sure is that this issue has brought more attention to the cause of the unborn then if Obama didn't win the primary against Clinton. So is Obama in one sense a God send for the sake of attention to the unborn? As reported above there are many hurdles against the unborn one being media attention. Is it not interesting that the first forum between Obama and McCain is a religious one? Issues like abortion, religious freedom and gay marriages....If anything it will bring more attention then less to the unborn and what better of an issue to get the attention of the public then this issue regardless of whether or not Obama had good reason for not passing such a bill showing the reality of the humanity of the unborn child left to die after a boched abortion...So whether this is providence or coincidence may we pray in Jesus name that this issue is a God send by bringing Obama to the forefront for the sake of both the unborn and survivors of this promiscuously sinful and thus abortion filled society and that Obama, being one of those survivors, has a Godly revelation in his mind over this issue just like Norma McCorvey did (see Testimony of Roe of Roe vs Wade) thus providing a great testimony for all members of humanity."

Part 4

Jill Stanek vs Obama. Obama changes "fact sheet". More media attention is being given to the unborn and Obama's voting record on abortion.-"The Obama campaign has sent me their argument layout and that can be viewed here. The National Right to Life argument is here."

"Do click on both. I have yet to read the National Right to Life argument but it is clear that Planned Parenthood issued a fact sheet in 02/2003 that stated something to the effect that even though the language was indeed similar to the federal bill that another amendment was necessary at the state level. Which makes sense coming from that perspective. However, Obama never is reported of giving this reason for not supporting the bill in 2003 which should raise a question as to why not? Rather the reasoning given until 08/16/2008 was that the state and federal bills were different which is correct but only because he did not vote to pass that bill as amended to include the amendment necessary which he doesn't explain either. So these two questions remain for me. Either way the unborn are getting attention and Obama's hard pro-choice position is getting attention, also.

Now as I have read thru the National Right to Life argument and placing the two together I believe the issue is much clearer. A must read, cause as you read the two together connecting the dates and notice that on Obama's argument there is no quote at all from him reported in the argument for giving the reason Planned Parenthood's fact sheet gave for not voting on the bill in his state and so it is quite a providential omission of information by Obama whether purposeful or not that wasn't caught back then when he was running for senate but now may be an issue that costs alot more at a presidential level and at the same time bring more attention to the unborn then if it were caught at the state as opposed to this national level and limelight!!! Maybe making abortion a bigger issue then it is now!!! Wow!!!"

Part 5

Jill Stanek vs Obama and the mainstream media. The Media attention continues to mount..-"Speaking of the Providential Nurse (see New Documents Revealing Obama's cover up on Born Alive Infant Protection )herself, Jill Stanek will be busy in the media this election...This story is grabbing the attention of many mainstream media outlets but why not TV?....And the mainstream media that does grab the story grab it with an Obamasided bias as expected...Another Providence I can see in all this is the exposing of why Americans are continually seeing the mainstream media as bias with a liberal political slant. This story would make for a big story and maybe one of the networks will pick it up and even if they do are they just going to undermine it like the rest. Are they just going to rehash what is in the liberal mainstream media??!!! Imagine if this was Bush. For some reason I can just guess it would be all over!!!"

Part 6

Jill Stanek vs Obama. Introducing a new term, Obamaside. Have you ever been Obamasided? Let me explain...-"How Barack Obama Could Not Have Won the Democratic Nomination Without ABC, CBS and NBC...These are the key findings of the Media Research Center’s exhaustive analysis of ABC, CBS and NBC evening news coverage of Barack Obama — every story, every soundbite, every mention — from his first appearance on a network broadcast in May 2000 through the end of the Democratic primaries in June 2008, a total of 1,365 stories. MRC analysts found that the networks’ coverage — particularly prior to the formal start of Obama’s presidential campaign — bordered on giddy celebration of a political "rock star" rather than objective newsgathering."-See Full Report here with graphs and all. Thanks to the Media Obama is the next democrat presidential candidate as opposed to Clinton. This I have found to be a Providential God send. 1) It is allowing more discussion concerning media bias, 2) abortion is being brought to the spotlight thus unborn babies getting attention in the media and 3) this Born Alive Infant Protection Act issue with Obama would not be getting nearly as much air time and revelation of media bias if it weren't for Obama instead of Clinton on the stage. So this gives an opportunity to expose media bias which is a hurdle for the unborn and at the same time talk about the unborn in a most extraordinary way with the context being the Born Alive Infant Protection Act that I myself, didn't here about at all till this election season and until I started listening in to conservative news media. Please do for sure watch the last video on this page and pay close attention to what this nurse says as she describes a baby that survives an abortion. None of these discussions that is bringing much attention to the unborn and Obama's pro-abortion stand and media bias would not be going on if it weren't for the media's president of choice. Thank you media!!! For more on Obamaside see below...Obamaside-media that is one sided but in this case the one side is Obama's side. Example: mainstream media and ABC, CBS, NBC and PBS. First original context was in the discussion over Obama's reasoning for not voting on a bill to protect infants who survived an abortion when he and the media that sided with him responded first by calling his skeptics (those of the pro-life community) liars and then afterward when revising his position didn't acknowledge the truth of their claims and continued the same rhetoric and to top it off even claimed that he understands and respects his opponents point of view which clearly demonstrated Obama did neither. See below for further context..."

"So may the media and Obama be laid providentially exposed as they are attempting to persuade pro-life voters that there is improvement in the democrat party over this issue. The only respect that Obama has shown us is in words not in deed nor in apology over this issue.To respond to the democrat abortion platform being more pro-life then ever before let me comment that one of those statements in that platform include the right of a women to choose to abort despite financial situation. Where do you think that money to fund that abortion is going to come from? Obama's pocket or ours and Obama's? Sure Obama may be morally ok with this but are we? Does Obama really respect our views and understand our moral objection to this when Obama and democrats seek to force us to pay for abortions via Planned Parenthood and Health Insurance with our State and Federal Taxes? It's all lip service don't believe it for a moment!!!"

From Jill Stanek's site concerning the video that is on this blog of her being interviewd by Hannity: UPDATE, 8/22, 4a: One of Hannity's producers emailed me yesterday: "Just so you know we got a jump of 100,000 people in demo (ppl btw 25-45) during your segment, which is fantastic."

Part 7

Jill Stanek vs Obama. Obama caught on tape arguing against giving medical attention to aborted babies... "But a pro-life sleuth has found a short audio clip on the Chicago Tribune website of Obama arguing on the IL Senate floor on April 4, 2002, against Senate Bill B1663, a companion bill to the Born Alive Infants Protection Act that would have required an abortionist to call a second physician to assess a baby aborted alive. Obama advocating infanticide audio mp3 Obama advocating infanticide audio wav Here is the Senate transcript to ensure the comment is heard in context...

Wright's connection to Christ Hospital. I first wrote about this in a WND column over a year ago: Did Wright influence Obama to oppose IL's Born Alive Infant Protection Act?"-Check out the 9 points she makes. Even if Wright didn't influence his decision one thing is clear that Obama's church is connected to the hospital in a big way as one of the members of that church was a CEO of the hospital during the time this was occurring and considering all 9 points mounted together. So now we have Obama's pastor and church all wrapped up together in this Born Alive Infant Protection Act. This has been another issue that has been most damaging for Obama that being his church and pastor!!!! Is God providentially speaking here? Who would have known if it weren't for the pro-life journalism of this conservative christian nurse speaking on behalf of "the least of these", the unborn? One thing I see here is that the mainstream media may be biased on this issue in not reporting it and when reporting it completely distorting it may actually may come back to haunt both their candidate and their own credibility by continuing not to report on it and when reporting on it completely distorting all because of the uglyness of this issue and when people actually do find out. Are the born alive babies providentially speaking to us from the utility rooms they were left to die in? Are they speaking up against media bias and the candidate that left them there that the media seems to be favouring? They have not been given a voice by many men and women in the media but this past week God has providentially given them a voice in answer to many a persons prayers. And so lastly, to top it off McCain has officially made this issue an issue in his campaign!!!!!...See his comments below....

In summary

Those born alive and left to die are bringing attention to the unborn and those killed while being partially born in God's good providence. McCain has officially made it an issue and if it were not for God's providence on 08/16/2008 with a christian broadcasting news company and a christian faith forum all of this would still be much under the radar. Now if the media doesn't report and report fairly then we have really good evidence for liberal media bias which is one of the biggest hurdles for the unborn and we have more attention despite the liberal media being given to the unborn and more credibility to conservative news sources on this issue which is one of the unborn's biggest supporters and all because Obama won the democrat primaries and not Clinton. So again is Obama a providential God send? You decide...

Also, could some in the liberal media rethink their position on Obama and their reporting and can this have an effect on the liberal media all because of the lack of information on this subject presented by the liberal media? Did they shoot themselves in the foot by not making this an issue and now that it is coming to be an issue that could destroy their own candidate and credibility even in the eyes of some of their own??!!

John McCain's Weekly Radio Address-"U.S. Senator John McCain's presidential campaign today released the text of John McCain's weekly radio address for tomorrow morning. The text and audio file are embargoed until tomorrow at 7:00 a.m. EDT. DOWNLOAD THE AUDIO FILE HERE: http://www.johnmccain.com/Downloads/082208_B.mp3...at what point, in my opponent's view, does a baby have human rights? Senator Obama thought about it for a moment, and came back with the reply that the question was, quote, "above my pay grade." Here was a candidate for the presidency of the United States, asked for his position on one of the central moral and legal questions of our time, and this was the best he could offer: It's above his pay grade. He went on to assure his interviewer that there is a, quote, "moral and ethical element to this issue." Americans expect more of their leaders....Listening to my opponent at Saddleback, you would never know that this is a politician who long since left behind any middle ground on the abortion issue. He is against parental notification laws, and against restrictions on taxpayer funding for abortions. In the Illinois Senate, a bipartisan majority passed legislation to prevent the horrific practice of partial-birth abortion. Senator Obama opposed that bill, voting against it in committee and voting "present" on the Senate floor....In 2002, Congress unanimously passed a federal law to require medical care for babies who survive abortions -- living, breathing babies whom Senator Obama described as, quote, "previable." This merciful law was called the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. Illinois had a version of the same law, and Barack Obama voted against it. At Saddleback, he assured a reporter that he'd have voted "yes" on that bill if it had contained language similar to the federal version of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. Even though the language of both the state and federal bills was identical, Senator Obama said people were, quote, "lying" about his record. When that record was later produced, he dropped the subject but didn't withdraw the slander. And now even Senator Obama's campaign has conceded that his claims and accusations were false. For a man who talks so often about "hope," Senator Obama doesn't offer much of it in meeting this great challenge to the conscience of America. His extreme advocacy in favor of partial birth abortion and his refusal to provide medical care for babies surviving abortion should be of grave concern to reasonable people of goodwill on both sides of this issue. There is a growing consensus in America that we need to overcome narrow partisanship on this issue for both women in need and the unborn."-Wow!!! These are some big time claims and I wonder what Obama and the mainstream media will do in reporting on these claims and answering them? Will it be a) nothing or b) report it with a bias that distorts the truth or c) allow the nurse an interview or allow it to be an issue period!!!! This story would make bucks for the networks as it has on the Hannity show so why aren't they grabbing at the opportunity to draw more listeners? On this issue it is not greed it is Obamaside.

P.S.- Actually McCain was wrong that the documents were provided after Obama said what he said. The documents were public 5 days before Obama said what he said and in the Chicago tribune the Obama campaign responded to the claims with an actual copy of the federal and state bill side by side showing the lack of wording in the state bill (which is a complete distortion of appearance that is in dispute and has been soundly refuted by the two documents provided that Obama has misrepresented but if this doesn't make sense then re-review Part 1 thru 7). Now maybe Obama didn't actually looked at the documents himself which is possible granting that he didn't deal with the actual claims at hand for whatever reason and yet still called his opponents speaking up for the unborn liars.

"Keep me from the snares which they have laid for me, and the gins of the workers of iniquity. Let the wicked fall into their own nets"-Psalm 141.9,10. Could it be that this principle in scripture is happening providentially before our very eyes and that the "snare" that the mainstream media "have laid for" the unborn is the very "net" that the mainstream media will "fall into". Or in otherwords their unwillingness to report on issues of abortion will be the very issue that destroys their credibility as mainstream!!!!!!!!!!!!