So why are liberals painting those seeking further documentation of President Obama's past especially when it is known to exist. See: Dr Fukino's second statement confirms errors at Snopes.com and FactCheck over Obama's birth certificate. I mean if other presidents were open to urinalysis records (see article below) then surely Obama can be transparent enough to seal the matter shut once and for all.

WND.COM reports evidence of other candidates that released information to public at: Dig this: Media actually probed other candidates and subtitled "Divulged personal documents on arrests, surgeries, colleges".

The article starts off with: "In the last 18 years, highly personal information has been published about presidential candidates, including divorce and alimony details, drunk driving arrest records, college grades, urinalysis results, prostate cancer surgery – even details about George W. Bush's hemorrhoid troubles.

The media have dredged up medical, military, college and detailed records for Republican and Democratic Party candidates in at least the last five elections. Candidates were subject to intense scrutiny of their health conditions, academic performance and military careers.

However, while such private information about other candidates was divulged, more than 440,000 concerned citizens still have yet to see President Obama present his elusive "long-form" birth certificate and several other documents that remain unreleased or otherwise blocked from the public eye.

As WND has reported, Obama has not released his long-form birth certificate, college transcripts, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records or his adoption records...."

It is quite a read for the history of past presidents going thru similar scrutiny as Obama is today. However, these records were actually obtainable but Obama's remain a mystery so far.